A push is the sports-betting version of a tie: the final result lands exactly on your number, the wager is graded no win, no loss, and your stake is returned. Simple idea… yet it drives more customer disputes than you’d think. I’ll break down how pushes work across spreads, totals, moneylines, parlays, teasers, player props, soccer markets, and Asian handicaps—plus the edge implications you actually care about.
Books use these terms loosely, but the outcomes differ behind the scenes.
| Grading term | What it means to you | Typical triggers | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Push | Stake returned; wager counted as settled | Exact tie with your line (e.g., +3.0 lands 3) | Counts toward rollover at some books; check promo T&Cs |
| Void / No Action | Stake returned; treated as if never placed | Postponements, player DNP, market error | Parlays shrink by one leg; promos often excluded from progress |
From a wallet perspective, push and void look identical. From a compliance and promo-accounting perspective, they’re not. As an operator, spell this out on your house rules page to cut tickets.
A spread with an integer (no half-point “hook”) can push.
NBA and NFL have “key numbers” (3, 7 in NFL) where pushes cluster. Books price hooks accordingly.
Totals ending in .0 can push; .5 totals can’t.
Some sports include overtime by default (NBA, NHL), others are “90 minutes only” (soccer). Whether OT counts alters push probability. Read the market header every time.
In leagues with overtime to a decision (NFL, NBA, NHL playoffs), a standard 2-way moneyline won’t push. In markets where a draw is possible and not a listed outcome, a tie pushes by rule (e.g., “Draw No Bet” in soccer). In 3-way markets (home/away/draw) there is no push—the draw is a losing outcome if you didn’t select it.
If the book offers ±1.0, a one-run/one-goal margin creates pushes. Most commonly you’ll see ±1.5 to avoid pushes.
Props posted at an integer (e.g., QB 240.0 passing yards) push on exact. With .5 they don’t. If the player never takes the field, most books void rather than push.
| Ticket | Result | Grading |
|---|---|---|
| 3-leg parlay; one leg pushes; two win | Wins | Paid as a 2-leg parlay |
| 4-leg parlay; two legs push; one wins; one loses | Loses | Losing leg sinks it; pushes removed |
| 2-team teaser; one wins; one pushes | Varies | Reduced to 1-team teaser (paid at house scale) or loss, per rules |
Books hate administrative sludge. So they use pricing and product design to reduce pushes:
If you’re the player, “no push” formats should come with better odds to compensate for the extra losing path (e.g., 3-way moneyline). If you’re the operator, price it fairly and explain it clearly.
Asian lines create fractional outcomes by splitting your stake across two adjacent numbers.
Same logic applies to Asian totals (2.25, 2.75, etc.). This is how pros smooth volatility without surrendering too much price.
| Line | If draw | If win by 1 | If lose by 1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| –0.25 | ½ push / ½ loss | Full win | Full loss |
| +0.25 | ½ win / ½ push | Full win | Full loss |
| –0.75 | — | ½ win / ½ push | Full loss |
| +0.75 | — | Full win | ½ loss / ½ push |
I’ve run the sims; here’s what moves the needle.
Operator take: publish a key-number policy and make hook pricing consistent. Bettors forgive losses; they don’t forgive feeling nickel-and-dimed.
You bet Bengals –3.0 at –110. Final: Bengals 23, Ravens 20.
Margin = 3 → push → stake returned.
You bet Over 48.0 at –105. Final: 27–21 = 48 → push.
3-leg parlay: Chiefs ML, Under 46.0, Lions –3.0. Lions win by 3 → push on that leg.
Ticket pays as a 2-leg parlay on Chiefs + Under.
You bet Arsenal –0.75. Final: Arsenal 1–0.
Half stake on –0.5 wins, half on –1.0 pushes → net half win.
| Market | Can it push? | When | Typical grading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread (±X.0) | Yes | Margin = X | Push |
| Spread (±X.5) | No | — | Win/Loss only |
| Total (X.0) | Yes | Points/goals = X | Push |
| Total (X.5) | No | — | Win/Loss only |
| Moneyline 2-way (OT to a decision) | No | — | Win/Loss only |
| Moneyline 2-way (DNB) | Yes | Draw | Push |
| Moneyline 3-way (1X2) | No | — | Win/Loss only |
| Asian handicap (quarter lines) | Partially | Draw / 1-goal margins | Half push/half win/half loss |
| Parlay | Indirectly | Any leg pushes | Leg removed, repriced |
| Teaser | Maybe | Any leg pushes | Reduce or loss (house rules) |
Here’s my bottom line: a push is not drama, it’s plumbing. The fewer surprises your book produces, the longer your players stick around. If you’re an operator, standardize your push/void language and surface it on slips by market type; it cuts complaints and increases trust. If you’re the bettor, treat pushes as variance control—then focus on getting the best number.
If you want a clean, brandable rules template (push/void/teaser/OT) for your sportsbook or a key-number pricing audit, we at NOWG can spin that up fast. And if you’re optimizing your hold while staying fair, try NOWG’s free online tools for casinos and books—line value calculators, teaser EV checkers, and parlay repricers—to sanity-check promos before you ship them.
TL;DR Free affiliate tracking in iGaming is a narrower list than most roundups admit. The…
TL;DR iGaming CRM vendors sell omnichannel AI orchestration. Most operators under 100k DAU need four…
TL;DR There is no production-ready free sportsbook software that handles real-money wagering, live odds, and…
TL;DR Sports betting B2B vendors are good at demos and bad at answering the questions…
Quick answer: what is the best iGaming solution? The best iGaming solution depends on your…
Last updated: April 2026 · 14 min read · Written for iGaming operators launching or…